Craig: If the dominant community attitude is "before you know everything about Clojure, you have no right to comment", then that itself will be the reason not to use Clojure. But I think that is just you, not the community.
Although I am glad some people paid attention to this post, I have far more important things to do than seeking some attention from strangers. I hope I stimulated some thinking here. I am a lisp lover, and I feel Clojure has a good potential of being a great and practical language, but it has its broken parts too and I wish they get fixed, so I will have a better experience using it. That is my goal (obvious I hope). On Saturday, June 30, 2012 12:17:39 PM UTC-4, Craig Brozefsky wrote: > > Warren Lynn <wrn.l...@gmail.com> writes: > > > As I mentioned before, the issue here is not just a fast "last". The > > issue here is I find the design of Clojure "wrong", or confusing. > That > > really shakes my confidence in the whole system. > > To say stuff like this, then be demure about digging into the code and > understanding how things work, followed by asking for others to be do > the coding and be and advocate for your rather vague feeling of unease, > strikes me as passive-aggressive attention seeking. To do such while > top posting, well, it's just too much for me. 8^) > > -- > Craig Brozefsky <cr...@red-bean.com> > Premature reification is the root of all evil > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
