On Aug 17, 2012 4:53 PM, "David Jacobs" <da...@wit.io> wrote: > Okay that's great. Thanks, you guys. Was read-lines only holding onto > the head of the line seq because I bound it in the let statement?
No; (partial nth values) holds on to values, and map holds on to the function you give it. Omitting needless lets is a matter of style in this case. -- Stephen Compall If anyone in the MSA is online, you should watch this flythrough. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
