Interesting. Would that use case be covered by an implementation of the proxy macro, et al? Said implementation could produce proper Google Closure javadocs with @extends / @implements, as well as calls to goog.inherit
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:56:24 PM UTC-7, red...@gmail.com wrote: > > I've used it to make ClojureScript functions in to javascript object > constructors > > (defn Foo [] (js* "/*") (js* "*/")) > > results in the generated return being commented out, so (Foo.) works > > I use this in a macro for creating new types that are based on > existing Google Closure types > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Brandon Bloom > <snpr...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > I'm exploring some changes to the ClojureScript compiler backend and am > > curious if anyone is using one particular implementation detail: The js* > > special form. > > > > Note that I'm not asking about the js/ pseudo-namespace, only the js* > > special form. > > > > Are you using it in your ClojureScript projects? If so, what for? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > -- > And what is good, Phaedrus, > And what is not good— > Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
