So you would introduce all of the functions first, then insert the body into the inside? Major issue that I can see is that it's very powerful and very useful only in very specific circumstances, but isn't extensible at all. Looks cool, though. Maybe you could write a macro that does something like this?
- DAemon On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM, vhsmaia <v...@viclib.com> wrote: > Hello. I'm new here, so, not sure if those were already posted. But why is > this not used? An example would be: > #(%a %%b %%%c) would be the same as (fn [a] (fn [b] (fn [c] (a b c))) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
