Compile compliance level: 1.6
Generated class files compatibility: 1.6
Source compatibility: 1.6

I think regardless of what jdk you use to run/compile them, these 3 (or at
least the first 2) are affecting what you said. I got those from eclipse
(but there should be command line equivalents of those: ie. in project.clj
with leiningen
*:javac-options ["-target" "1.6" "-source" "1.6" "-Xlint:-options"
"-g:source,lines" "-encoding" "utf8"]*
, I pasted the entire line, but only -target and -source are relevant)

I think the usual errors when one project uses 1.7 (for the first 2) and
the other uses like 1.6, is like:
*java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Unsupported major.minor version*51.0
(where the number may differ)

In eclipse, all 3 must be the same else it will not allow it, i see.

Anyway, that's my 2 cents about it:) I may be wrong, corrections/additions
are welcome.

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:27 AM, JvJ <kfjwhee...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just found out that my clojure project is using jre7, while the other
> project is using jre6.  That probably has something to do with it.
>
> In other words, you were right. In eclipse, by default, changing the jdk
used changes all 3 of those automatically by default (unless you have
Enable project specific settings for the Java Compiler section in project
properties - but if you're using leiningen to uberjar this has no effect
obviously, it's the above in project.clj you'd want)


>
> On Monday, 15 October 2012 19:17:26 UTC-4, JvJ wrote:
>>
>> I'm having a peculiar issue with Java interop.
>>
>> I'm running a program in 2 different ways:
>> -Running the program directly
>> -Calling the main function from Clojure
>>
>> Oddly, by calling main from Clojure, I get an exception that isn't there
>> when I run normally:
>> UnsupportedOperationException This parser does not support specification
>> "null" version "null"  javax.xml.parsers.**SAXParserFactory.setSchema
>> (:-1)
>>
>> I was able to use the debugger using both running methods, and the
>> parameters seem to be the same.  I just don't get it.  Does anyone have any
>> ideas?
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to