I don't yet understand how laziness helps. Can anyone point me to a reference? I have vague memory that one of the videos addresses this (I remember something about "these are not iterators"), but I'm having trouble finding it now.
I'm finding that lazy seqs are too slow for everything, so I expect I'm using them incorrectly. Many of the core functions return seqs, and I invariably end up wrapping them with (vec ...) to get any kind of reasonable performance. Is that what I should be doing? Is a lazy seq mostly about algorithmic clarity, and avoiding unnecessary computation? So far I haven't run into any cases where I wouldn't realize the entire sequence, and it's always faster to do it up-front. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
