you're right, my bad. should have read it more carefully :) On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > if I am doing this right, then your supposed approach does not work. From > looking at the code of seq-test (to which the alternative form using just a > vector in xml-> boils down, too) it seems to be more like a look ahead > within the current node. See e.g. the test code at > https://github.com/clojure/data.zip/blob/master/src/test/clojure/clojure/data/zip/xml_test.clj#L45 > > (I can't claim to fully grok mapcat-chain in zip.clj, though.) > > > Regards, > stefan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
