We systematically use them. Our typical use case however is way above this threshold. The policy here is that it cannot be worse than the persistent version.
Luc P > Some quick benchmarking that I did, showed that it is actually more > expensive to convert to transient, conj/assoc and convert back to > persistent than the regular conj/assoc unless you want to do more than 8 > operations at a time (preferably more than that). My experiments were on > vectors and the vararg version of assoc/assoc!. > > any thoughts? would you agree? > > Jim > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- Softaddicts<lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> sent by ibisMail from my ipad! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
