Thanks Alex. My two cents is that your syntax is more the way I'd expect it to look, starting off like an actual let with support for destructuring, followed by the forms.
Only advantage I can think of for the one in core is that it enforces that you only have one binding. Basing let-> off of let notation might cause people to think you could bind multiple vars to values in the initial bracketed part; that would be somewhat nonsensical. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
