I've noticed that the "+" character can be used in namespaces without 
seeming to cause any issues, e.g.

    (ns app.view.posts+comments)

This also appears to work fine when there is AOT compilation, with the 
symbol being munged in the same way a function name would be.

Is it a good idea to create a namespace like this? If namespaces are 
allowed all the characters of a symbol, then the EDN spec would suggest 
this is a permitted namespace name. However, I haven't seen this style of 
namespace before.

>From a purely aesthetic standpoint, "posts+comments" seems a nice way of 
denoting the name of a composite view.

- James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to