To answer your question:
(def x (into [] (map (fn [x] (ref 100))
(range 10))))
Or, instead of map & into, use mapv.
But yes, 90% of the time you are better served by putting the entire vector
in a single ref. Try using as little mutable state as possible, and you'll
often find that good design just falls into place.
Timothy Baldridge
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Thomas <th.vanderv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I create a vector of different refs?
>
> I would like to have a vector with in each cell a ref so that I can
> manipulate them independently from each other (Is that a good idea
> anyway?). But when I do
>
> (def x (into [] (repeat 10 (ref 100))))
>
> I end up with the same ref ten times (not surprisingly), but I would like
> to have ten different refs instead.
>
> TIA,
> Thomas
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
“One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking
zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.”
(Robert Firth)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
