If longevity is your top most concern, I have a suggestion here:

http://www.itarchitectforumblog.com/content/application_development/cobol_dead_language_rising.html

And if you do not think it's all around us:

http://itsacobolworld.blogspot.ca/?m=1

This thing has been alive and kicking since the 60s and has it seems a bright 
future.

However, do not expect to do anything significant under 15000 locs per code
units (aka namespace) or to become functional any time soon   :)))

Life is made of compromises...

Luc P.


> If you don't get a flood of responses, I think it is because in this thread 
> and the one linked earlier that Leon Adler started, several different people 
> have explained evidence that Clojure on the JVM has had active development 
> for five years, it is open source, and no one knows of any evidence that this 
> will change any time in the future.  That isn't the same as saying "will 
> remain", but it is the best anyone can give you that is based on evidence and 
> reason, rather than some other dubious methods.
> 
> If you believe another language will give you better assurances than that 
> about its future target/platform, I don't see how you came to that 
> conclusion, unless it is by making up conclusions out of thin air.
> 
> Andy
> 
> On Dec 29, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Leon Adler wrote:
> 
> > That's unforeseeable because, that represents a very long time.
> > 
> > Having said that, this statement deserves a resay...
> > 
> > The JVM will remain the primary target/platform for Clojure, while Oracle 
> > remains good i.e. it doesn't get Barmy.
> > 
> > What say the other people?
> > 
> > On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:53:12 PM UTC+5:30, Sukh Singh wrote:
> > Having read the posts all over again, can I say that the JVM will remain 
> > the primary target/platform for Clojure, while Oracle remains good i.e. it 
> > doesn't get Barmy ? Isn't that unforeseeable?
> > 
> > On Thursday, December 27, 2012 4:56:52 PM UTC+5:30, Sukh Singh wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I have noticed that this question is randomly appearing in many minds, and 
> > it is frequently being asked, though there is no apparent reason on why it 
> > is asked :/ or maybe people are unable to pen down the exact reasons, and 
> > sad to say, even myself. 
> >  
> > There are reasons for which I ask this question -> 
> >     People (Majority) tend to stick with the primary implementations of 
> > certain multi-implementation software. And in the case of Clojure, the  JVM 
> > implementation is the primary implementation now.
> >       
> >     Having a primary implementation in case of BDFL lead software helps as 
> > a glue in the community. For example , CPython is the primary python 
> > implementation, even if there is an existance of IronPython or JPython.
> > 
> >     The doubts of many, including me, will be cleared by an abstract 
> > answer... That 'many' also include the companies adopting something new, in 
> > this particular case, adopting clojure....
> >  
> > QUESTION
> >  
> > Rich Hickey chose JVM as the platform of choice when he invented Clojure. 
> > It's 
> > community developed set of tools and documentation grew around the JVM 
> > (Leiningen, for example). 
> >  
> > From the above statements, can I say that  
> >  
> > the JVM will always likely, remain the primary Clojure implementation ? 
> > 
> > 
> > Thank You.
> >  
> >   
> >   
> >   
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
Softaddicts<lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> sent by ibisMail from my ipad!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to