The dispatching mechanism was more trouble than it was worth but we did lose some flexibility. Do you really need to unify Sequential or is unifying with a concrete type like PersistentVector work well enough for your use case?
David On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Austin Haas <aus...@pettomato.com> wrote: > > The datomic unification code in core.logic has bit-rotted. It depends on > IUnifyWithSequential, which was removed in this commit: > https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/commit/bbc4e820128d5a0745ce3d79cd3bbd9401a1bf55 > > I'm trying to understand how to update the code, but I don't get how > dispatching works following the above commit. It appears that each > implementation of IUnifyTerms must dispatch on the second argument, and I > don't see how to get clojure.lang.Sequential to dispatch on a datom unless > I override the implementation of clojure.lang.Sequential unify-terms here: > https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/core/logic.clj#L1581 > > I must be missing something. Any pointers would be appreciated. > > -austin > > -- > Austin Haas > Pet Tomato, Inc. > http://pettomato.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
