Sean pointed me to it in the other thread. I read the ticket and discussion - I personally don't feel it's abuse. To me it feels as natural a use of destructuring as any other.
just my 2c. Leonardo Borges www.leonardoborges.com On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Toby Crawley <t...@tcrawley.org> wrote: > This issue has already been reported and filed: > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1140 > > There's been some discussion around that issue on clojure-dev@ as to > whether this is a regression or an abuse of destructuring. > > Leonardo Borges writes: > > > Alright so the bug appears in Clojure 1.5.0-RC1 - I'm not sure whether > this > > is a regression or intended behaviour so I'll send a separate email to > the > > list about that. > > > > > -- > Toby Crawley > http://immutant.org | http://torquebox.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
