For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of "pr-str" your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because "pr-str" works by using "with-out-str". This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same.
On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: > > I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: > > => (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] > (do (pr x) > x)))) > #'user/k > => k > "(012340 1 2 3 4)" > > This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in > clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private > functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
