Thank you, I'm using it and it does work. However, there is presumably a good reason for the existence of the ^objects annotation, so the question remains whether this is a) specified behavior and b) the way it is planned to stay.
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:32:31 PM UTC+1, Michael Klishin wrote: > > > 2013/2/24 Marko Topolnik <marko.t...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > >> I do need to avoid reflection. > > > Then use ^"[Ljava.lang.Object;" > and friends, it works just fine. > -- > MK > > http://github.com/michaelklishin > http://twitter.com/michaelklishin > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
