Hi, Very nice work. I'm interested in using graph but just curious in terms of your priorities for future development.
I noticed that you listed as a todo, you might want to save the body of a fnk which I see as a potential for inlining the bodies and thus eliminating the fn call when creating the final composite fnk. Is this correct? Also how would you advice situations when you have mutual recursion (with conditions to bound execution) but still want the compositional power of graph? (like being able to substitute only certain components of the graphs in different situations). I understand that my usage of recursion implies there will be cycles and graph only emits code in topological order so its currently not supported. Is there future support for this or is this outside the scope of graph? Any tips for reclaiming compositional power? -Brent -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
