I switched to just using (:require) with :as and :refer unless there's a really 
good reason to use :use. It stops me from accidentally making the mistake of 
dropping [my.ns.core :as foo] into a growing (ns (:use …)) form.  

--  
'(Devin Walters)


On Sunday, March 10, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote:

> I would say using :require :as is in almost all cases better.
> However, I think :use is preferred if almost everything done
> in the current namespace depends on the used namespace.
> Though, no more than one namespace should ever be imported
> with :use in the same namespace.
>  
> In your case I think it's acceptable to :use the namespace with
> protocols - but no more. Also, :use :only is to be avoided almost
> as much as :use. I tend to use :use :only for common functions
> that are not in core. clojure.java.io/resource 
> (http://clojure.java.io/resource) being the most common
> one.
>  
> Jonathan
>  
>  
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Alex Baranosky 
> <alexander.barano...@gmail.com (mailto:alexander.barano...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > From experience in your case (300+) I'd use require/as with a small prefer 
> > like p/ .
> >  
> >  
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com 
> > (mailto:jimpil1...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > On 10/03/13 12:03, Marko Topolnik wrote:
> > > > I came to prefer one-letter prefix for a common ns over no prefix at 
> > > > all. Once you get accustomed to it, prefixless fns start looking 
> > > > "wrong", and the overhead of two chars is something we can live with.
> > > yes I agree with you 100%...this is my approach as well for 'useful' 
> > > namespaces...for example a hypothetical utilities.clj is good if it's 
> > > aliased uniformly across namespaces as 'ut'...do you do the same with 
> > > your abstractions? do you always alias your protocols.clj? my question is 
> > > specific to protocols as they will only be used in a couple of places, 
> > > mainly in the 'concretions' namespace...to be honest, at the moment I'm 
> > > using :refer :all simply because I'd need the characters 'pro/' more than 
> > > 300 times in that namespace...it would actually make readability worse in 
> > > my opinion...
> > >  
> > >  
> > > Jim
> > >  
> > > --  
> > > --  
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com 
> > > (mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com)
> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > > your first post.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > > (mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com)
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > > (mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com).
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> > >  
> > >  
> >  
> > --  
> > --  
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com 
> > (mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com)
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > (mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com)
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> > ---  
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Clojure" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > (mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com).
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >   
> >   
>  
> --  
> --  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com 
> (mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com)
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> (mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com)
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> (mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com).
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>   
>   

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to