On 12 Mar 2013, at 13:52, Marko Topolnik <marko.topol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I meant, succeed by relying on the way f/j is used by the > reducers public API, without copy-pasting the internals and using them > directly. So I guess the answer is "no". I don't believe that I could - the CollFold implementation effectively does a binary chop on the sequence which would force the whole sequence to be realised if I did the same. It's a sensible strategy for a fully realised data structure that already exists in memory, but not for a lazy sequence. -- paul.butcher->msgCount++ Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park... Who says I have a one track mind? http://www.paulbutcher.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher MSN: p...@paulbutcher.com AIM: paulrabutcher Skype: paulrabutcher -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
