Think of it in layers, like this---layer 1:
{w :weigths, u :uni-probs, b :bi-probs, t :tri-probs}
Then, instead of an atomic w, recursively substitute another destructuring
form, which will destructure the value of that w (which is also a map).
This form is {:keys [w1 w2 w3]}. That gives you complete layer 2:
{{:keys [w1 w2 w3]} :weigths, u :uni-probs, b :bi-probs, t :tri-probs}
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:58:43 PM UTC+1, Jim foo.bar wrote:
>
> On 19/03/13 19:49, Marko Topolnik wrote:
> > {{:keys [w1 w2 w3]} :weights}
>
> awsome!...the full thing actually is {{:keys [w1 w2 w3]} :weights u
> :uni-probs b :bi-probs t :tri-probs}
>
> I always get confused when the order changes like that...thanks for
> unblocking me Marko :)
>
> Jim
>
>
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
