On 20 March 2013 08:36, Marko Topolnik <marko.topol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you responsibly keep to the "good parts", exceptions could be the way > to go. Validation is one example where I love them because it happens all > around, but validation failures are all handled uniformly. > If validation happens "all around", that implies there is no one function that can test whether a value of data is valid for a given data store. This strikes me as a somewhat shaky foundation for a system. There may be instances where it makes sense to use exceptions as a control flow mechanism, but I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to use something like CPS in those instances. - James -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
