Not even that: -> is not a function composition operator at all, but a form-rewriting macro. You can perfectly well write (-> [x xs] (for (inc x))) to get (for [x xs] (inc x)), and that is not composing any functions. The two things are entirely separate.
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 12:45:55 PM UTC-7, Marko Topolnik wrote: > > I guess you mean the monadic bind operation, but -> is not it. The only > conceptual connection between *bind* and -> is that they are both some > kind of function composition operators. > > -marko > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 8:21:43 PM UTC+2, Plinio Balduino wrote: >> >> Hi there >> >> Is it correct to say that -> operator is a kind of monad in Clojure? >> >> Thank you in advance. >> >> Plínio Balduino >> > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
