Mark Engelberg <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Mark,
> Example:
>
> (def as-and-bs
> (parser
> "S = AB*
> AB = A B
> A = 'a'+
> B = 'b'+"))
Nice, but providing the grammar as a plain string looks somewhat
unnatural to me. Why not something like this (parser being a macro)?
(def as-and-bs
(parser
S = AB* .
AB = A B .
A = "a" + .
B = "b" + .))
I.e., symbols denote non-terminals, strings denote terminals, and the
dot indicates the end of a rule.
Bye,
Tassilo
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
