Thanks Michael. I really didn't know how to 'sell' it because there's quite a bit of thought in there about how to make it work with existing javascript libraries so that the clojure syntax does not get in the way and it's difficult
Maybe I have started talking def.n or about TDD first. I posted on the clojurescript group about that but the post it hasn't been moderated yet. @David: i never knew that you can add more parameters to aget. However, the only problem i found with using aget was that if I have a nested object and one of the keys are missing, then I get an undefined error. Where as I want it to fail with a nil. I'm not really that interested in promoting my ! and ? operators and comparing forms, but how entire libraries of code can be written. There's a code transformer macro that take an entire form and rewrites all of the dotted symbols. So that could be changed to take advantage of the efficient inlining. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
