On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Mikera <mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Maybe we could try to develop towards some kind of lightweight dependency > loading system that avoids this problem? I believe "lightweight dependency loading system" is an oxymoron. Either you A) design a new module format and try to get everyone to follow it (OSGI) or B) build an ad-hoc solution that tries to guess at the right behavior (JBoss). Either way, application developers still have a mess to deal with, just with an added layer of complexity. If someone out there can fix this problem once and for all, I will buy you a drink. But you can't bill me for all the drinks you'll need along the way. ;) -S -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
