I just realized it after I posted, but thanks for the help anyways.

On Thursday, 6 June 2013 15:27:28 UTC-4, Jim foo.bar wrote:
>
> On 06/06/13 20:23, JvJ wrote: 
> > Is there a shorter form of [&{:keys [] :as m}]? 
>
> if you don't care about the actual keys just do this: 
>
> [& {:as m}] 
>
> HTH, 
>
> Jim 
>
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to