The result can be JVM-dependent.  I've solved a bug in our codebase that
was due to JDK 7's reflection preferring a different constructor for an
object than 6, which was fixed by explicitly wrapping the ambiguous
argument in (boolean).  Whatever the behavior, it's best to not rely on a
specific brokenness.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant <
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nathan,
>
> I just had a quick look at the implementation: I think Clojure picks the
> first matching method if several are found.
>
>
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Reflector.java#L70
>
> It's probably worth testing this out though.
>
> Thanks,
> Ambrose
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:24 PM, N8Dawgrr <nathan.r.matth...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a question regarding ambiguity in reflective dynamic invocation.
>>
>> In Clojure you can dynamically invoke a method on a Java class like so:
>>
>> (. some-instance bar arg)
>>
>> where bar is a method name.
>> If the type inferencer can't ascertain the type of some-instance a
>> runtime reflective path is used to perform the method invocation.
>> Lets suppose some-instance is of type Foo which has two overloads of
>> method bar:
>>
>> bar(Apple arg)
>>
>> and
>>
>> bar(Orange arg)
>>
>> Now lets suppose Apple is an interface which extends Fruit and so is
>> Orange.
>>
>> Now lastly lets suppose we have a class MutantFruit which implements BOTH
>> Apple and Orange.
>>
>> My question is what method is invoked at runtime for the following code:
>>
>>  (. some-instance bar mutant)
>>
>> where mutant is an instance of MutantFruit
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>>  --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to