After some investigation, the before-the-arglist syntax only seems useful
for defining fn's that return primitive types.
They don't seem to help resolve reflection calls.

(require '[clojure.tools.analyzer :refer [ast]])

; this creates a double-emitting fn

(ast (fn (^double [^double a] a)))
; =>
;{:op :fn-expr,
; ...
; :methods
; ({:op :fn-method,
;   ...
;   :arg-types (#<Type Ljava/lang/Object;>),
;   :return-type #<Type D>}),   ;double return type here
;  ...
; :tag nil}  ; no tag

; this creates a regular old fn

(ast (fn (^String [a] 1)))
; =>
;{:op :fn-expr,
; ...
; ({:op :fn-method,
;   ...
;   :arg-types (#<Type Ljava/lang/Object;>),
;   :return-type #<Type Ljava/lang/Object;>}),  ;object return type
; ...
; :tag nil}  ; no tag

; this creates a String-hinted fn

(ast ^String (fn a [a] 1))
;{:op :meta,
; ...
; :expr
; {:op :fn-expr,
;  ...
;  :methods
;  ({:op :fn-method,
;    :arg-types (#<Type Ljava/lang/Object;>),
;    :return-type #<Type Ljava/lang/Object;>}),
;  ...
;  :tag String}}

I don't see where before-the-arglist is useful outside of primitive fns.

Thanks,
Ambrose

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It seems to me that return type-hints can go either right after "defn", or
> after the doc-string. I generally, put the return type-hints right before
> the argument vector and it seems to get rid of reflection. However, I just
> had a look at core.contrib.strutils2 and the author(s) put the type hint
> right after 'defn' (before the var about to be defined) and again it gets
> rid of reflection! Which one is it? both are acceptable?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> Jim
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to 
> clojure+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to