I couldn't comment in your blog, so I'll write it here.
I would prefer the following solution:
(let [matrix [[1 0 1]
[0 1 0]
[1 0 1]]]
(simplify `(* 5 (determinant ~matrix))))
with the option of using a macro construct-expression:
(let [matrix [[1 0 1]
[0 1 0]
[1 0 1]]]
(simplify (construct-expression (* 5 (determinant matrix)))))
construct-expression could query the current environment:
http://blog.jayfields.com/2011/02/clojure-and.html
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2013 23:24:50 UTC+2 schrieb Maik Schünemann:
>
> Hi,
> I discussed general design issues for expresso before, but the (for you)
> most important part - the user api - was left out.
> I have written a blog
> post<http://kimavcrp.blogspot.de/2013/06/constructing-algebraic-expressions.html>
> about
> what is the most seamless way to use expresso and discussed a few different
> ideas.
> I would like to know which approach is your favourite, or if you can think
> of an other, better way of using it.
>
> There is also the interesting idea of making it an implementation of
> core.matrix, so that it can be trivially used on any
> core.matrix expression.
>
> kind regards
> Maik
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
