Jason Wolfe wrote: > We thought we were being very careful Sorry, didn't mean to imply that you weren't. ;)
It was me who wasn't careful: when I started investigating this, I used a dead-code loop similar to the Gist I posted, which made it look like Clojure 1.2 was much faster than 1.5. I guessed (incorrectly) that you had observed the same effect for the same reasons. -S -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
