On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:53 AM, Rich Morin wrote: > > That said, I'm also very interested in Light Table, which appears to be > developing rapidly into an open framework for IDE experimentation. So, > I'm wondering whether it might be easier and more productive (over the > long term) to create some "simple" LT add-ons than to maintain Clooj.
Yeah -- I shouldn't have said that "nothing else in the ecosystem can touch" Clooj's combination of functionality and usability because I do think that Light Table is in the neighborhood and it's certainly super cool in many other ways. When I've considered switching to it in the past, which I think I do every couple of months, I've been really impressed but had a hard time seeing how to do some less-cool but more ordinary things... like maybe getting unadorned text output? Maybe something about dealing with projects? It's possible that I haven't given it enough time, and I know I was thinking that it seems to be developing quickly so I'd check back again soon... -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
