You will also run into problems if your functions close over any data:

user> (let [f (fn [] 1)] (eval `(~f)))
1
nil
user> (let [x 1 f (fn [] x)] (eval `(~f)))
IllegalArgumentException No matching ctor found for class
user$eval38616$f__38617  clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeConstructor
(Reflector.java:163)

I'm struggling with this as well, I'm definitely interested in finding
a non-hacky way to pass closures through eval without leaking memory.

Perhaps something like:

(let [x 1
       f (fn [] x)
       f-sym (gensym)]
  (intern *ns* gensym (weak-ref f))
  (with-meta (eval `(fn [] (do-stuff-with @~f))) {::strong-ref f}))

So that way f will be freed up when the resulting fn is gced.

On 28 August 2013 17:59, Ben Wolfson <wolf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jamie Brandon
> <ja...@scattered-thoughts.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you aren't worried about leaking memory, a possible workaround is
>> to intern the fn in some namespace and then put the symbol in the
>> macro output.
>
>
> Hrm, I hope it doesn't come to that---as long as I'm creating the functions
> with their metadata, I can make things work, because I can add extra
> information to the with-meta call or do extra things when making the call.
> What I'd like, though, is for it to be possible to copy the metadata over to
> a new function by client code, just using the regular (with-meta (fn [blah]
> blah) (meta old-fn)) mechanism. But then the sneaky symbol, or whatever
> extra thing, in the metadata, that's used in the form to be eval-ed is
> pointing to the original function, not the one passed in. Maybe just
> providing a utility for fixing up the metadata is the right move, though
> it's kidn of dissatisfying.
>
>
> --
> Ben Wolfson
> "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
> may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
> life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure."
> [Larousse, "Drink" entry]
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to