On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Mikera <mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com> wrote: > I remember the debates :-) and I don't think there was anything like a > consensus that "don't do that" is the right answer.
I didn't say there was consensus or that it was right :) > I'm not against giving the user control. I just think the default behaviour > should be super-friendly and not spit out warnings. I don't think it's at all "friendly" to have standard functions _silently_ replaced by some library I included. I want to know about the collisions and I want to be able to control how those collisions are resolved. Or I can explicitly decide to ignore the warnings. But the warnings _should_ happen. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
