1878 went out today, the only change was fixing a bug introduced by 1877 that caused spurious warnings when incrementally compiling.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Brandon Bloom <brandon.d.bl...@gmail.com>wrote: > > a (very) temporary workaround is to use the old code > > Why not just switch (k coll) to (get coll k) ? > > If you know that coll is non-nil, you can also just use (coll k). Both > forms also accept an optional not-found value. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescr...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
