>
> This brings up another issue: Currently writing to a closed channel is a
> no-op, but it probably should throw an exception. Similarly, closing a
> closed channel is a no-op, but also probably should throw an exception.
> Both are things that a well behaved sender should never do, since they know
> when they close, so they know not to keep putting stuff in there. Or, they
> are warned of the impending close by some coordination process & the same
> rules apply.
>
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but why not return true on successful
put, false otherwise? That would allow for the following:
(loop []
(let [results (get-metrics metrics)]
(when (async/>! mchan results)
(recur))))
You could terminate blocks simply by closing the channel. You also avoid
the messy higher order (quit) channel.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
