On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: > wasn't cond-> designed exactly for that? > > (let [x (some-expression)] > (cond-> x > (p x) f > ((comlpement p) x) g)))
That's uglier than the if :) Sometimes I wish there was a variant of cond-> that took functions instead of boolean expressions and threaded the expression thru those (just to wander further off-topic)... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
