On 10/24/13 5:46 AM, Paul Butcher wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 11:34, Phillip Lord <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk
<mailto:phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk>> wrote:
What does Scala do? I mean, given that it doesn't have the same problem,
perhaps it has a solution?
By default, Scala uses a tree-based set, not a hash-based set. So the
fact that it doesn't run into hashing issues isn't surprising (and is
yet another example of how this isn't a perfect apples-to-apples
comparison).
However, I've just tried rerunning the Scala using a hash-based set
implementation, and that takes the runtime down from around 2.5
minutes to just over 2.
Which hash-based set implementation did you use for that comparison? It
would be nice to look at the hashing fn it is using.
-Ben
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
