On 08/11/13 10:11, ru wrote:
I forget to say that call to count have been done in not a bare repl,
but inside a quite complex program after it did a lot of work on a
quite big data.
so your problem does not lie with 'count' but with something
else...actually 'count' doesn't hold on to the head of the seq so even
tough sometimes it will take a long time (for large seqs), it will never
StackOverflow:
user=> (-> 500000000 range count)
;;after quite some time
500000000
user=>
But, after long and profound analysis of source code I did not found
any places with deep recursive calls :( Something like stack is
filling against my will...?
there must be something else causing this...have you tried
(clojure.stacktrace/e) right after the exception?
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
