"juan.facorro" <juan.faco...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Clojurers, > [snip] > > There are parsing libraries which provide good parse trees (i.e. Parsley, > Instaparse), but my understanding is that what needs to be > mantained is a full abstract syntax tree for the whole code base and although > clojure.tools.analyzer [4] does the job of creating an > AST, generating and mantaining all these trees sounds very costly and not the > right way to do it.
Just an idea. Maybe you should just use the parse tree for locals and the repl for globals. That shouldn't be too costly. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
