Hi Stephen, I now understand what you meant. Thanks writing a minimal test case.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Stephen Cagle <same...@gmail.com> wrote: > And already, I see that the first one should have been > > (defn test [] > (async/go > (println (async/<! (foo))))) > > Boy I wish you could edit this post after the fact. > > On Monday, January 13, 2014 3:32:39 PM UTC-8, Stephen Cagle wrote: >> >> I just want to re-iterate that there are many (some are probably better) >> ways to do this, but using what I suggested above it would be: >> >> (defn foo [] >> (async/go "hi")) >> >> (defn test [] >> (println (async/<! (foo)))) >> >> (defn test [] >> (let [c (async/chan 10)] >> (async/go >> (async/>! c (async/<! (foo))) >> (println (<! c))))) >> >> (test) >> >> I wrote the first (test) minimally as you aren't really doing anything >> with your 10 slot buffer. However, in real code maybe you are, so I tried >> to write the second (test) in the fashion that you wrote it. >> >> There is nothing really to what I am saying other than that, yes, the >> core.async codewalker cannot see into code that you call into. Therefore, >> if the code you call into also needs to do asynchronous things, you need to >> wrap it in something like a go block as well. With the above solution you >> might have 2 go machines "live" at the same time (the test and the foo go >> machines). >> >> In short, you have a trade-off here. If you want to modularize your code >> at the function (go machine) level, you are going to potentially have >> multiple go machines "live" at the same time. >> >> I don't have an editor/compiler on this tablet, so apologies for any >> silly errors. >> > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
