Hi, (let bindings form) is a special form. As I understand it, let can be reformulated in terms of functions e.g.
(let [x 2] (* x 20)) equivalent to ((fn [x] (* x 20)) 2) (let [x 3 y (* x x)] (- y x)) equivalent to ((fn [x] ((fn [x y] (- y x)) x (* x x))) 3) So if we can always reformulate in this was, why cant let be implemented as a macro rather than a special form? Where have I gone wrong in my understanding here? Andy -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
