Didn't mean to imply that you should try to "corner" the market in refactorings, but simply thought you might be wanting to promote a useful Clojure tool across editors. I'm not sure if Chris views Light Table as a Clojure-centric editor though at this point, Clojure probably does have the best support. As far as LT not having this kind of functionality already, the plugin system was just recently (around a month) formalized so that's to be expected. Given that the editor is developed in ClojureScript, I assumed that a port from Emacs Lisp might not be as much work as going to a different language altogether.
On Saturday, February 1, 2014 4:30:47 PM UTC-5, Magnar Sveen wrote: > > Sorry, mate. It's not about cornering the market in clojure refactorings - > it's just scratching our own itch, and hopefully other people find it > useful too. > > I'm a little surprised Light Table doesn't offer these things already. > Isn't it a Clojure-centric editor? > > On Saturday, February 1, 2014 8:22:53 PM UTC+1, adrians wrote: >> >> Really cool stuff, guys. Are you considering a Light Table version as >> well? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
