On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:51 AM, <shlomivak...@gmail.com> wrote: > One note about your SuperVecs idea though, it seems that using that > approach we could get a deeply nested tree to represent our a vector, and I > think this is the exact thing vectors are trying to avoid..
In general I think this is true for vectors, but in this covers one particular use-case where I've often found generation time to be more important that a faster lookup. If you favor a faster lookup then a normal vector can be used instead of course. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
