That are very great news! do you think this change in the design could have any side effect? For me this "lazy" concept is quite new and until today I only have read posts about the possitive effects it brings.
Do you think it could require that much of more memory that in some situations the OS would kill the process? (I am sorry if it sounds extreme... it's a side effect after work on clompex firmware scenarios). If some side effects are detected perhaps would be desiderable an activation flag for this patch (e.g. someone who prefers a full initialization at first). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
