AFAIK the only thing that records do not support compared to StructMaps is namespaced keyword lookup, i.e. (:some-ns/a-key a-record).
If you do not need this, you should consider using records. Las On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Moritz Ulrich <mor...@tarn-vedra.de> wrote: > The data type created by defstruct isn't anything more than a map > which can store the specified fields a bit more efficient than > 'normal' maps. You can just `assoc' any other key-value pairs as in > any other map. > > Also, have a look at records - I think StructMaps have been deprecated > (or at least aren't recommended anymore) for some time now. A record > (`defrecord') will do pretty much the same, just nicer ;-) > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:51 AM, <cmhowa...@alaska.edu> wrote: > > Hi. I'm very new to Clojure, but I've read most of the functional > > programming tutorial <http://java.ociweb.com/mark/clojure/article.html>. > > > > Suppose I have a data structure called "node" that can be in one of a > number > > of different states -- namely, "down", "waiting", and "running". Suppose > > that in the "running" state, the node has a "job-id" number associated > with > > it, but such a number is not applicable in the other two states. Should I > > add an extra field, and only check that field in the "running" state, > like > > so... > > > > (defstruct node :state :job-id) > > > > Or is there some better, or more "clojure-ish", way to approach this? > > > > If I was doing this in Haskell, I think that I would perhaps make some > kind > > of algebraic "NodeState" data type, and have the JobId only attached to > the > > Running constructor. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
