Is that via gen-class? I have to admit that I am not very familiar with gen-class, is it still possible to use the class from Clojure?
Yes, that is probably the most pragmatic choice, premature optimization and all that. On Friday, 4 April 2014 15:03:00 UTC+1, Phillip Lord wrote: > > Anvar Karimson <an...@karimson.com <javascript:>> writes: > > I am trying to understand what the best course of action would be in the > > following scenario: > > > > I have a Java base class that I need to extend. The class is fundamental > to > > my application and will be running fairly hot compared to other bits of > > code in the application. Therefore I want it to execute as fast as > > possible. The way I see it there are two options; > > > > 1) Use proxy > > 2) Create a class in Java that provides the glue between Java and > Clojure > > and removes the need for extending the base class in Clojure. > > > > I would prefer to use option 1 but I am a little bit worried about the > > performance implications of doing so, especially adding a level of > > indirection by using map-lookup for accessing methods so I suspect I > will > > have to go with option 2. > > > > Any recommendations or alternatives? > > Or Option 3, create a class in Clojure which extends the Java. > > My suggestion, try number 1 which is easy, then performance test it. > > Phil > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.