2014-04-12 20:36 GMT+02:00 Fergal Byrne <fergalbyrnedub...@gmail.com>:
> It's always best to see how best to do something, one day it'll make all > the difference. > I agree. Most people call it gold-plating. And of-course you have to be careful about that, but things like this are good to do is my opinion. > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Cecil Westerhof > <cldwester...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> 2014-04-12 16:18 GMT+02:00 Fergal Byrne <fergalbyrnedub...@gmail.com>: >> >> That's fine, but note that creating new Calendar objects has an overhead, >>> using System.currentTimeMillis() is a static OS call which your now() >>> probably uses, as well as object creation. It probably won't be millisecond >>> sized, but you can measure your (now) using criterium.bench to be sure. >>> >> >> The now function is not called often, so it does not really matter, but I >> changed it anyway. As expected the time is the same, but good code is also >> nice to have. >> > -- Cecil Westerhof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
