On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Sean Corfield <s...@corfield.org> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Val Waeselynck <val.vval...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As for what Gregg and Sean objected - that Clojure code is > self-sufficient as documenting itself - I have to simply disagree. > > That is NOT what I said. Please go back and read my response more > carefully. Not what I said either. Where did "self-sufficient" come from? -Gregg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
