On May 19, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Greg D <gregoire.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> user> (unchecked-add ^Long(Long/MAX_VALUE) ^Long(Long/MAX_VALUE) ) > ArithmeticException integer overflow clojure.lang.Numbers.throwIntOverflow > (Numbers.java:1424) The docs for unchecked-add (http://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.core-api.html#clojure.core/unchecked-add) only cover the case of both arguments being primitive longs. Calling with other argument types invokes behavior that is not currently documented. That may be intentional to allow the behavior to change in the future, or it may be an oversight in which case the docs could be improved to document the intended behavior for more argument types. Regarding the current implementation, there is code to handle the case of calling unchecked-add with two Long arguments. In that case, unchecked_add behaves the same way as + does and throws the overflow exception. --Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
