On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Atamert Ölçgen <mu...@muhuk.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Atamert Ölçgen <mu...@muhuk.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Define rational. To me, it looks like absence of a choice of law clause >> means I have no idea where I might end up in case of litigation. Name your >> favorite corrupt legal system here. With a choice of law clause at least >> you can be somewhat confident that the contract can be enforced under some >> semblance of the rule of law. >> > > > Are you saying the corrupt judges of the corrupt legal system will act > differently just because you have chosen a license with a choice of law > clause that's referring to the law in effect at other side of the planet? > Oh good grief don't be ridiculous. I'm saying pick the jurisdiction you think most likely to deliver lawful governance. I don't care which side of the planet or which planet. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
